In this past week lower Manhattan, NY was flooded with thousands of protesters in support of the movement against Wall Street. Protesters are demanding for more separation between banks and government, an end to corporate greed and increased support towards education. With over 200 arrested and many injured, the protest did become violent and unruly in some instances. Protesters even threatened to move to subways, blocking routes for thousands of NY residents.
Though I believe in the demands of this protest, when the right to express your views begins to cause danger and hazards to citizens, is it still appropriate? Blocking major streets, subways and transportation routes can disrupt ambulance and emergency routes, isolate everyday commuters, and create chaos. Law enforcement is left with drawing the line between 'freedom of speech' and 'public safety'. Today's revolutions are meaningful, but they often come with a price of unrest and violence. Get more information of the chaotic situation that NY has just experienced at http://www.nypost.com. The title is " OWS Protesters cause mayhem across the city, 275 arrested.
All that is happening on the Wall Street is very interesting. But, how does this comment connect to the media?
RépondreSupprimerWhat do you think about the traditional media coverage about these events? What can people do if they feel their views are not represented and that the development of the society is no longer controlled by the nation but by corporations and technocratic rules? Is there any alternative?